Session:Regulating Law Enforcement uses of Trojans - Revision history

LuciferSam at 20:27, 27 June 2017

2017-06-27T20:27:13Z

LuciferSam at 20:26, 27 June 2017

2017-06-27T20:26:55Z

LuciferSam at 20:26, 27 June 2017

2017-06-27T20:26:25Z

LuciferSam: /* About the talk */

2017-06-06T18:12:54Z

‎About the talk

LuciferSam: Created page with "{{Session |Has session tag=transparency, Government |Is for kids=No |Has description=Implementing a Law to juridically, operationally and technically regulate the uses of Troj..."

2017-06-06T18:07:49Z

Created page with "{{Session |Has session tag=transparency, Government |Is for kids=No |Has description=Implementing a Law to juridically, operationally and technically regulate the uses of Troj..."

New page

{{Session
|Has session tag=transparency, Government
|Is for kids=No
|Has description=Implementing a Law to juridically, operationally and technically regulate the uses of Trojan in Italy

The complexity of implementing a policy (law) and related operational and technical procedures to regulate the uses of Trojan by Law Enforcement in a way that protect civil rights while not preventing investigations from going on with the right balance of juridical/technical implementation.
|Has session type=Talk
|Processed by village=Village:ItalianEmbassy, Village:ItalianEmbassy-Talks
|Held in language=en - English
}}
==About the talk==
This talk will explain which are the juridical and related technical and operation problems in the uses of Trojan by law enforcement (note: only LEA, we are not speaking of intelligence/NSA/GCHQ/etc).

We’ve setup in Italy a team of a technologist MP, a IT-skilled Lawyers and an Hacker/Privacy Activists, to goes trough the difficult trip to achieve the implementation of a Legislation that works either on paper, either technically that can have a shared consensus among usually opposing parties such as civil rights organization and security apparatus (law enforcement & prosecutors).

We’ll explain the bit of history and experience in setting up such a law (how to do it in your own country!), which are the logical framework, the juridical framework, the operational framework and the technical choices to do it.

We hope that this experience represent a milestone in regulating something (the Trojan) that are here to stay, given the increase of default IP encryption with the corresponding decrease in investigative power trough passive IP surveillance system.

All of this in the context of privacy activism where part of the community fully reject any instance of accepting government hacking instances and in turn criticize this effort.

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 |Has start time=2017/08/05 16:30
 |Has duration=60
 }}
 =About the talk=

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 }}
 {{Event
-|Has start time=2017/08/04
+|Has start time=2017/08/05 16:30
 |Has duration=60
 }}

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 |Processed by village=Village:ItalianEmbassy, Village:ItalianEmbassy-Talks
 |Held in language=en - English
 }}
 =About the talk=

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 |Held in language=en - English
 }}
-==About the talk==
+=About the talk=
 This talk will explain which are the juridical and related technical and operation problems in the uses of Trojan by law enforcement (note: only LEA, we are not speaking of intelligence/NSA/GCHQ/etc).